Step 1 · Candidate, Topic & Feasibility Filter
Enter your working title and screen it against the four feasibility filters before writing anything further. A topic that fails any filter should be revised with your guide before proceeding to later tabs.
Step 2 · Introduction & Review of Literature
Summarise what is already known, and state clearly what gap this study will fill. Keep this focused — organise by theme, not by paper.
Step 3–5 · Research Question, Objectives & Hypothesis
State the question in PICO/PECO format, then translate it into one primary objective (this must match your sample size calculation), optional secondary objectives, and — for analytical/comparative studies — a hypothesis.
Step 6 · Study Design
Select the design that best fits your question and your available timeline, then justify the choice in one or two sentences — tie it explicitly to how soon the primary outcome can be assessed.
Step 7 · Materials and Methods
This is the most scrutinised section by the Ethics Committee. Be specific and internally consistent — every assumption in the sample size calculation should be citable.
Step 8 · Ethical Considerations
Step 9 · Expected Outcome & Significance
Step 10 · References
One reference per line, in the citation style specified by your institution (commonly Vancouver style for biomedical theses).
Step 11 · Timeline & Budget
Present a month-by-month breakdown mapping each phase to your available registration period — this is what forces a genuine feasibility check on paper.
Step 12 · Preview & Download
This preview regenerates automatically as you fill each tab. Use the toolbar above to download it as a PDF for review submission.