Synopsis Writing Tool — Interactive Workshop Template

Fill each tab in order. Your entries auto-populate a formatted synopsis on the Preview tab, ready to download as PDF and submit for review.

Not saved yet

Step 1 · Candidate, Topic & Feasibility Filter

Enter your working title and screen it against the four feasibility filters before writing anything further. A topic that fails any filter should be revised with your guide before proceeding to later tabs.

Self-check before proceeding — tick once confirmed with your guide (this checklist is for your own use and is not printed in the synopsis).

Step 2 · Introduction & Review of Literature

Summarise what is already known, and state clearly what gap this study will fill. Keep this focused — organise by theme, not by paper.

Step 3–5 · Research Question, Objectives & Hypothesis

State the question in PICO/PECO format, then translate it into one primary objective (this must match your sample size calculation), optional secondary objectives, and — for analytical/comparative studies — a hypothesis.

Step 6 · Study Design

Select the design that best fits your question and your available timeline, then justify the choice in one or two sentences — tie it explicitly to how soon the primary outcome can be assessed.

Cross-sectional / Prevalence Study
Exposure and outcome measured at a single time point. No follow-up needed — fastest design to complete.
Case-Control Study
Starts with outcome, looks back for exposure. Good for rare outcomes.
Retrospective Cohort Study
Uses existing records; no enrolment/follow-up bottleneck — a strong option under tight timelines.
Prospective Cohort Study
Followed forward from enrolment. Feasible only if the primary outcome matures early (e.g. within a few months).
Ambispective Cohort Study
Retrospective arm plus a prospective arm — often the best insurance against slow recruitment.
Randomised Controlled Trial
Investigator-assigned, randomised comparison. Needs a short-term primary endpoint to fit a PG timeline.
Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Index test compared against a reference standard, usually within a single visit.
Case Series / Descriptive Study
No comparison group; describes a case group's characteristics or outcomes.

Step 7 · Materials and Methods

This is the most scrutinised section by the Ethics Committee. Be specific and internally consistent — every assumption in the sample size calculation should be citable.

Paste the link to the Google Form you have created for data collection. This will appear in the Methods section of your printed synopsis, immediately after Outcome Measures.

Step 8 · Ethical Considerations

Step 9 · Expected Outcome & Significance

Step 10 · References

One reference per line, in the citation style specified by your institution (commonly Vancouver style for biomedical theses).

Step 11 · Timeline & Budget

Present a month-by-month breakdown mapping each phase to your available registration period — this is what forces a genuine feasibility check on paper.

Step 12 · Preview & Download

This preview regenerates automatically as you fill each tab. Use the toolbar above to download it as a PDF for review submission.